ADAPTASI MATA PENCAHARIAN (LIVELIHOOD) DAN WELL-BEING DI PERMUKIMAN KUMUH

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF
Diterbitkan Mar 31, 2023
DOI https://doi.org/10.53651/jdeb.v16i1.418

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Mizan Ikhlasul Rahman
Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Abstrak

Analisis adaptasi mata pencaharian memberikan pemahaman tentang bagaimana aktivitas masyarakat mengatasi berbagai kendala dan bertahan hidup di permukiman kumuh bernama Desa Mantuil, Kalimantan Selatan, Indonesia. Lima kategori modal, yaitu modal manusia, modal sosial, modal fisik, modal keuangan, dan modal alam (natural), dipertimbangkan dalam analisis adaptasi mata pencaharian ini. Analisis ini mencoba memenuhi tuntutan untuk mengurangi ketimpangan dan kemiskinan yang kompleks di perkotaan dan untuk meningkatkan inklusivitas di kota dan well-being masyarakat di permukiman kumuh. Secara bersamaan, penelitian ini mencoba mengisi research gap dengan menghasilkan analisis menyeluruh yang disarankan dari istilah permukiman kumuh, yaitu dengan mempertimbangkan karakteristik dan praktik permukiman kumuh yang ada di dalamnya. Survey lapangan dilakukan terhadap 164 responden, untuk mengumpulkan informasi mengenai bentuk-bentuk adaptasi yang dijalankan oleh masyarakat di Desa Mantuil. Bentuk-bentuk adaptasi ini diklasifikasikan ke dalam lima kategori modal. Teknik Rank Based Quotient (RBQ) digunakan untuk mengeksplorasi bentuk adaptasi yang paling berpengaruh dalam peningkatan well-being. Analisis RBQ menunjukkan bahwa bentuk adaptasi yang paling berpengaruh untuk meningkatkan well-being adalah memaksimalkan pekerjaan yang dijalani saat ini, mengintensifkan kepedulian terhadap masyarakat, membeli sepeda motor, mengharapkan bantuan finansial dari keluarga, dan memanfaatkan lahan pertanian atau lahan milik keluarga. Pada akhirnya, untuk meningkatkan well-being, bentuk adaptasi yang paling berpengaruh ini perlu didukung dan dipertahankan karena bentuk adaptasi tersebut adalah bentuk yang paling mungkin diikuti dan dijalankan oleh masyarakat Desa Mantuil.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##submission.howToCite##
Rahman, M. (2023). ADAPTASI MATA PENCAHARIAN (LIVELIHOOD) DAN WELL-BEING DI PERMUKIMAN KUMUH. Dinamika Ekonomi: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 16(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53651/jdeb.v16i1.418
Terbitan
Vol 16 No 1 (2023): DINAMIKA EKONOMI Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol 16. No.1 Maret 2023
Bagian
Artikel

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Referensi

Arabindoo, P., 2011. Rhetoric of the ‘slum’ Rethinking urban poverty. City, 15(6), pp.636-646.
Biswas-Diener, R. and Diener, E., 2009. Making the best of a bad situation: Satisfaction in the slums of Calcutta. In Culture and well-being (pp. 261-278). Springer, Dordrecht.
Carney, D., Drinkwater, M., Rusinow, T., Neefjes, K., Wanmali, S. and Singh, N., 1999. Livelihood’s approach compared: A brief comparison of the livelihoods approaches of the UK Department for International Development (DFID), CARE, Oxfam and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), November 1999. London: Department for International Development.
Cronin, V.L.M., 2012. Slum upgrading in India and Kenya: investigating the sustainability (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge).
Das, A., 2015. Slum upgrading with community-managed microfinance: Towards progressive planning in Indonesia. Habitat International, 47, pp.256-266.
Davies, S., 2016. Adaptable livelihoods: Coping with food insecurity in the Malian Sahel. Springer.
Davies, S. and Hossain, N., 1997. Livelihood adaptation, public action and civil society: a review of the literature.
De Haan, L.J., 2012. The livelihood approach: A critical exploration. Erdkunde, pp.345-357.
Diener, E. and Suh, E., 1997. Measuring quality of life: Economic, social, and subjective indicators. Social indicators research, 40(1), pp.189-216.
Dolan, P., Layard, R. and Metcalfe, R., 2011. Measuring subjective well-being for public policy.
Dolan, P. and Metcalfe, R., 2011. Measuring subjective wellbeing for public policy: Recommendations on measures.
Dupont, V. and Gowda, M.S., 2020. Slum-free city planning versus durable slums. Insights from Delhi, India. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 12(1), pp.34-51.
Farrington, J., Ramasut, T. and Walker, J., 2002. Sustainable livelihoods approaches in urban areas: general lessons, with illustrations. Overseas Development Insitute, London.
Galiani, S., Gertler, P.J. and Undurraga, R., 2018. The half-life of happiness: Hedonic adaptation in the subjective well-being of poor slum dwellers to the satisfaction of basic housing needs. Journal of the European Economic Association, 16(4), pp.1189-1233.
Gilbert, A., 2007. The return of the slum: does language matter?. International Journal of urban and regional Research, 31(4), pp.697-713.
Glaeser, E. and Joshi-Ghani, A., 2013. The urban imperative: toward shared prosperity.
Glaeser, E.L., Resseger, M. and Tobio, K., 2015. Urban inequality (pp. 98-121). Routledge.
Grant, U., 2010. Spatial inequality and urban poverty traps. Overseas Development Institute. London, UK.
Harpham, T. and Grant, E., 2014. Health, health services and environmental health. In Urban Livelihoods (pp. 188-202). Routledge.
Huppert, F.A., 2017. Challenges in defining and measuring well-being and their implications for policy. In Future directions in well-being (pp. 163-167). Springer, Cham.
Jones, L. and Boyd, E., 2011. Exploring social barriers to adaptation: insights from Western Nepal. Global environmental change, 21(4), pp.1262-1274.
Lloyd-Jones, T. and Rakodi, C., 2014. Urban livelihoods: A people-centred approach to reducing poverty. Routledge.
Marschke, M.J. and Berkes, F., 2006. Exploring strategies that build livelihood resilience: a case from Cambodia. Ecology and Society, 11(1).
Meikle, S., 2014. The urban context and poor people. In Urban Livelihoods (pp. 60-74). Routledge.
Mitlin, D. and Satterthwaite, D., 2012. Urban poverty in the global south: scale and nature. Routledge.
Olsson, L., Opondo, M., Tschakert, P., Agrawal, A. and Eriksen, S.E., 2014. Livelihoods and poverty.
Rakodi, C., 2014. A livelihoods approach–conceptual issues and definitions. In Urban livelihoods (pp. 26-45). Routledge.
Rakodi, C., 2014. Economic development, urbanization and poverty. In Urban livelihoods (pp. 46-58). Routledge.
Roy, A., 2014. Slum-free cities of the A sian century: Postcolonial government and the project of inclusive growth. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 35(1), pp.136-150.
Rutherford, S., Harper, M. and Grierson, J., 2014. Support for livelihood strategies. In Urban Livelihoods (pp. 135-155). Routledge.
Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R.J. and Street, R., 1999. The science of adaptation: a framework for assessment. Mitigation and adaptation strategies for global change, 4(3), pp.199-213.
Start, D., 2001, May. Rural diversification: what hope for the poor. In ODI Meeting on Rural Development Food Security: Towards a New Agenda (Vol. 16).
van Dijk, T., 2009. Unpacking Urban Inequalities: The Strategic-Relational Livelihoods Approach. In NAERUS Conference Paper, Rotterdam.
White, S.C., 2016. Introduction: The many faces of wellbeing. In Cultures of wellbeing (pp. 1-44). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Wood, G. and Salway, S., 2000. Introduction: securing livelihoods in Dhaka slums. Journal of International Development, 12(5), p.669.
Yang, X., Guo, S., Deng, X. and Xu, D., 2021. Livelihood adaptation of rural households under livelihood stress: Evidence from Sichuan Province, China. Agriculture, 11(6), p.506.