PERSPEKTIF GONE THEORY DALAM DETERMINAN ACADEMICAL FRAUD

Article Sidebar

PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)
Published Mar 31, 2024
DOI https://doi.org/10.53651/jdeb.v17i1.491

Main Article Content

Fatimah Fatimah
UNIVERSITAS LAMBUNG MANGKURAT BANJARMASIN
Saprudin Saprudin
UNIVERSITAS LAMBUNG MANGKURAT BANJARMASIN
Muhammad Yasin
UNIVERSITAS LAMBUNG MANGKURAT BANJARMASIN

Abstract

Abstract,


The phenomenon of academic fraud has become a problem in almost all countries around the world. It is an interesting yet threatening phenomenon in the academic education world because education, which is supposed to be a means to improve the quality of human resources, has instead become a hotbed of many fraudulent practices.


Based on the phenomenon and research gaps in academic fraud studies, the researcher is interested in developing this research using the dimensions of the GONE theory as a differentiator from previous research. The GONE theory is often used to uncover corruption cases, so it is expected to serve as a basis for mitigation while exploring the causes of deviant behavior in the academic field conducted by accounting students in Banjarmasin.


The research results show that X1 and X2 have an influence, while X3 and X4 do not. Greed (X1) and Opportunity (X2) influence academic fraud, whereas Need (X3) and Exposure (X4) do not influence academic fraud.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fatimah, F., Saprudin, S., & Yasin, M. (2024). PERSPEKTIF GONE THEORY DALAM DETERMINAN ACADEMICAL FRAUD. Dinamika Ekonomi: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, 17(1), 217-234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53651/jdeb.v17i1.491
Issue
Vol 17 No 1 (2024): DINAMIKA EKONOMI Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Vol.17 No.1 Maret 2024
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

References

Abayomi, Sorunke, O., & Abayomi, Sorunke, O. (2016). Personal Ethics and Fraudster Motivation: The Missing Link in Fraud Triangle and Fraud Diamond Theories. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i2/2020

Albrecht, W. S., Albrecht, C. O., Albrecht, C. C., & Zimbelman, M. F. (2015). Fraud Examination. In South-Western Cengage Learning (Fifth Edit). Cengage Learning.

Amalia, N. (2015). Hubungan Goal Orientation dan Motivation Berprestasi dengan Intensi Menyontek Pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Psikologi Universitas MUlawarman. E-Journal Psikologi, 3(4), 387–398.

Becker, D., Connolly, J., Lentz, P., & Morrison, J. (2006a). Using the Business Fraud Triangle to Predict Academic Dishonesty among Business Students. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal.

Becker, D., Connolly, J., Lentz, P., & Morrison, Joline. (2006b). Using The Business Fraud Triangle to Predict Academic Dishonesty Among Business Student. Academy of Education Leadership Journal, 10(1), 37–54.

Billy, B., Andrianus, A., Yuliati, R., & Adelina, Y. E. (2019). Kecurangan Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi Berdasarkan Perspektif Fraud Diamond. Ekspansi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan, Perbankan Dan Akuntansi, 11(2), 157–178. https://doi.org/10.35313/ekspansi.v11i2.1346

Bologna, J. (1992). Handbook on Corporate Fraud: Prevention, Detection, and Investigation. Butterworth-Heinemann.

Dyah MK, I., Mawardi, M. C., & Amin, Moh. (2018). Analisis Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik pada Mahasiswa Akuntansi dengan Menggunakan Konsep Fraud Triangle. E-Jra, 08(02), 136–147.

Eckstein, M. A. (2003). Combating academic fraud Towards a culture of integrity. In International Institute for Educational Planning (p. 41).

Edukasi Okezone. (2017). Ya Ampun! Disertasi yang Diduga Plagiat Tak Ditemukan di Perpustakaan Kampus UNJ. Https://Edukasi.Okezone.Com/.

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. (Edisi 8). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Hariri, H., Pradana, A. W. S., & Rahman, F. (2018). Mendeteksi Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Dengan Perspektif Fraud Diamond Theory. JU-Ke (Jurnal Ketahanan ….

Hartanto, E. (2020a). Penarikan Sampel Penelitian.

Hartanto, E. (2020b). Penarikan Sampel Penelitian.

Indriartoro, N., & Supomo, B. (2002). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis, Cetakan Kedua. In Yogyakara; Penerbit BFEE UGM.

Munirah, A., & Nurkhin, A. (2018). Pengaruh faktor-faktor fraud diamond dan gone theory terhadap kecurangan akademik. Economic Education Analysis Journal.

Murdiansyah, I., Sudarman, M., & Nurkholis. (2017). Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond Terhadap Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik. Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual, 4(2), 121–133.

Purwanto, E., Mulyadi, J., & Anwar, C. (2017). Kajian Konsep Diamond Fraud Theory Dalam Menunjang Efektivitas Pengadaan Barang/Jasa di Pemerintah Kota Bogor. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 17(3), 149–162.

Ramamoorti, S. (2008). The Psychology and Sociology of Fraud : Integrating the Behavioral Sciences. Issues in Accounting Education, 23(4), 521–533.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. In Alfabeta. Penerbit Alfabeta. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

Wells, J. G. B. R. L. L. J. T. (1992). The Accountant’s Handbook of Fraud and Commercial Crime (1st Editio). Wiley.

Winardi, R. D., Mustikarini, A., & Anggraeni, M. A. (2017). Academic Dishonesty Among Accounting Students: Some Indonesian Evidence. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 14(2), 142–164. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2017.08

Zaini, M., Carolina, A., & Setiawan, A. R. (2016). Analisis pengaruh fraud diamond dan gone theory terhadap academic fraud (Studi kasus mahasiswa akuntansi se-Madura). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi XVIII, Universitas Sumatera Utara.